Showing posts with label bob dylan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bob dylan. Show all posts

4.08.2008

NOW IS THE TIME FOR YOUR TEARS

(Occasionally, I’ll write more of a long-form song analysis/interpretation. Today’s my first. Hope you enjoy - questions and comments welcome, as always. Feel free to be harsh, ‘cause this is nowhere near complete.)

But you who philosophize disgrace
And criticize all fears,
Bury the rag deep in your face,
‘Cause now is the time for your tears.

This has always been a perplexing lyric for me; has a reputation for being one of Dylan’s most confounding, last I checked.

To say I came late to this song would be putting it too nicely. In fact, my earliest exposure to the tune came after hearing Billy Bragg’s “The Lonesome Death of Rachel Corrie” - same chords, same melody, same chorus, different verses, and separated by something like forty years.

Bragg’s version deals, naturally, with Rachel Corrie, a young woman whose death also sparked some controversy, although in a decidedly different set of ways. The death of Hattie Carroll, and the subsequent trial of William Zantzinger*, is a story of a different sort.

Listening to Bragg’s update of “The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll”, I was immediately struck by the lyrics to that chorus. That was all I needed for inspiration to seek out the Dylan original.

And once I found it, I listened. And listened and listened and listened.

Back then, I thought maybe Dylan was singing about, I don’t know, fake empathy, false compassion. My sense was that “disgrace” and “fear” are not things one ought to “philosophize” and “criticize” on about – perhaps, I thought, Dylan is classifying that kind of behavior as cold, detached.

The “now ain’t the time for your tears” – which ultimately turns to “now is the time for your tears” – seemed almost like saying: “you know you’re not supposed to cry until the song is over.” For a long time, I took that as a critique of contrived emotion. But I missed the point.

Now, there are things I’m noticing about the song, about what Dylan is singing, and I see it a hell of a lot more clearly.

For starters, something I want to mention. A big reason why the song is so effective is that nowhere in the lyric does Dylan refer to Zanzinger as white, or Carroll as black. When the song reaches its conclusion, with Zanzinger receiving only a six-month sentence, we’re meant to take that as a grave injustice, and we do – but our feeling that way has nothing to do with his whiteness or her blackness, but rather, more significantly: that “she never done nothing to William Zanzinger”. And while the song makes the point of Zanzinger’s privileges – he “owns a tobacco farm of six hundred acres / with rich wealthy parents who provide and protect him / and high office relations in the politics of Maryland” – it never makes a correlation between privilege and race.

Dylan’s treatment of Hattie Carroll is similarly relatable: “a maid of the kitchen,” “who carried the dishes and took out the garbage / and never sat once at the head of the table / and didn’t even talk to the people at the table / who just cleaned up all the food from the table / and emptied the ashtrays on a whole other level”. Certainly anyone who looks at the true-life story of Hattie Carroll and William Zantzinger will notice their categorical differences – race, class, gender, age – but Dylan does something more difficult: he humanizes them.

Hattie Carroll was a maid of the kitchen
She was fifty-one years old and gave birth to ten children
Who carried the dishes and took out the garbage
And never sat once at the head of the table
And didn’t even talk to the people at the table
Who just cleaned up all the food from the table
And emptied the ashtrays on a whole other level.


That last line there, too, is among Dylan’s most elusive. For a clue, I’m inspired to look at some of the verbs our characters get throughout the song (since, y’know, actions speak louder). Zanzinger gets killed, twirled, owns, “reacted…with a shrug”, snearing, snarling, walking (I take walking the way I think Dylan meant it, as a harsh reminder: a murderer’s on the loose); Carroll gets gave birth, carried, took out (the garbage), (never) sat (no, not once), (didn’t even) talk, cleaned, emptied, (she never) done (nothing). While Zanzinger is something of a monster, Carroll is portrayed as a remarkble, humble, gentle woman (remembering Zanzinger’s cane, “determined to destroy all the gentle”). Perhaps that’s the “whole other level” she was on: the sheer extent of her decency; which makes her murder all the more awful, all the more pointless.

But the injustices keep piling up.

In the final verse, Zanzinger stands trial – trial for a malicious crime, a crime he committed for no reason, he “just happened to be feelin’ that way without warnin’”.

Then, finally, the sentence is delivered, and it packs a wallop in the worst way: six months?!

Dylan leads us up to this revelation by singing about the whole justice system: the “courtroom of honor”, where “all’s equal” and “the courts are on the level”, where “even the nobles get properly handled” (referring back to Zanzinger’s privilege).

There’s an irony and a cruel joke in the description of the judge as he delivers the sentence: “he spoke through his cloak, most deep and distinguished / and handed out strongly, for penalty and repentance / William Zanzinger with a six-month sentence”.

It was all a lie: the courts are not on the level, all is not equal, and no, the nobles will not be properly handled. Of course the “ladder of law” has a top and a bottom – and we know exactly where Zanzinger and Carroll fit into that. And it’s a cold truth.

Then, once more, the chorus – but it’s changed. (Everything has changed.) And it seems clear now: the reason Dylan sings that “now is the time for your tears” is because he was saving the greatest injustice, the real reason we ought to be crying, for that final verse.

The real coup de grĂ¢ce, the ultimate revelation, is not merely that these injustices were done, no; it’s that the whole system is corrupted. Justice itself cannot claim to be just. Therein lies the tragedy.

Yet I still find myself perplexed by “you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears”. It’s not about false compassion, at least not in the way I was saying before – not about contrived feeling, not about emotion when you’re “supposed” to feel it.

But maybe it’s false in another way. As lonesome as Hattie’s death is, as terrible as Zanzinger is, and as unjust his meager sentence is, they all pale in comparison to that greater injustice, the problem that no one is adequately addressing: the world we’ve made for ourselves, a world which allows such horrific things to happen in the first place.

*Here, I spell his name correctly, since I’m referring to the real Zantzinger. When I call him “Zanzinger”, I spell it like Dylan did – referring to the character in Dylan’s song. Me, I consider the real Zantzinger and the character to be different enough to make a distinction, if only because I can’t claim expertise when it comes to either the factual human being or the factual events this song is based on. And frankly, that’s not what this post is concerned with, anyway. The song tells a story; it doesn’t give a history lesson. So, for the purposes of this post, that’s how I’ve considered Zanzinger and Carroll: as characters in Dylan’s story.

(For more information regarding the song and its basis in fact, I suggest reading this story.)

--------------------

Today’s post is an older piece. I didn’t really want to post this, but...in the interest of full disclosure: this week, my laptop broke, so I’m doing all my writing in computer labs when I have the time, and usually that means I have time to do schoolwork and not much else. So, this will have to do until I get the damn thing fixed.

And sorry I can’t post the song; but if you don’t already have The Times They Are A-Changin’ you should really get on that, kid.

3.03.2008

IT'S-A HARD!


It’s-a hard to say what will last. Whenever we talk music – or any art, really – we inevitably drift into chatter of timelessness. As if that were something one could perceive! Aren’t there better ways to measure art? It’s really just a gamble, right?

The way I see it, ultimately, it’s up to the broader culture to canonize and maintain; and isn’t that what we’re really talking about when we talk about timelessness – the stuff that makes the cut, the stuff that’ll survive? (I’ve been persuaded, of course, to Dave Hickey’s point of view: that people don’t create art, the culture does.) In these terms, here’s what it boils down to: survival, for a work of art, merely means that the culture forces itself to remember you. And that’s kind of depressing, when you think about.

The real trouble: while it’s not quite an arbitrary process of selection and rejection (though it usually seems to be), there’s plenty of work which has – for lack of a better expression – the potential for timelessness, just not the good fortune. In other words, worthy art falls by the wayside – missing out on the broader recognition it deserves – every single day. That’s probably why we say shit like “she was so ahead of her time.” (Why are we so obsessed with time, anyway? Anybody?)

Somewhat begrudgingly, I’ll submit – or admit, I’m not sure which – that when it comes to Bob Dylan, timelessness is kind of a given. He’s one of the few modern songwriters to, for instance, have his lyrics included in a Norton Anthology – and if that’s not what canonization looks like, then I probably don’t know what I’m talking about. Stop reading now! But you know, there’re times (can’t avoid that word, can I?) when I’ll listen to this guy and feel like people are digging him for all the wrong reasons.

Bob Dylan – “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall”

This song has everything to do with it. People always get bowled over by those lyrics, lyrics which Allen Ginsberg thought signified a passing of the torch (to paraphrase); what with Dylan’s “skeins of bright images” (Ginsberg again) just bubbling up, up, up. But you know what? I never get around to slowing the song down enough to find out if the words are all that great. Maybe I would if I ever listened to the original version, from The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan. But I fell for this version, culled from Dylan’s Rolling Thunder Revue, and... well...

... can’t get up, man.

And I’m bowled over not so much by the sermon, but the sermonizing, if you can follow me. Which is more powerful? And who’s got the better approach to the medium: the listener who fawns over the words, or the one who’s obliterated by the sound? Maybe a better question is: does the fire and brimstone, the sheer juggernaut force of this live version, pummel the original?

Well, um, fuck yes it does. End of story.

So – what’s gonna last? You tell me. But I probably won’t hear you, being stuck inside this tornado and all. (In other words: regardless of what will last, THIS TOTALLY SHOULD.)

--------------------

Post-script: I could have written a much better post, could have said so much more about this song. (That bassline! It doesn’t walk, it kicks! Like a goddamn mule!) Oh well. Live and learn.